tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66918581350039632132024-02-06T22:15:37.435-08:00The Pendantic PaleogeekAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.comBlogger33125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-58865744481396563522014-12-06T12:27:00.003-08:002014-12-06T12:27:55.778-08:00Grimm: "Highway of Tears" & "The Grimm Who Stole Christmas Dual ReviewI couldn't get a chance to write about the next few episodes but I will with these two. I'll just briefly put my thoughts on the other episodes before I get to the two newest ones.<br />
<br />
<h3>
The Last Fight</h3>
<div>
This episode was good, not great, but good. I loved the Schinderdiv, and the final fight scene at the end made the episode more interesting.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Dyin' on a Prayer</h4>
<div>
For once, we finally have a non-Wesen.... Again. The Golem was very nice, and I liked Trubel's interaction with David. If I chose which Golem I would want, from Supernatural or Grimm, I will choose Grimm's any day.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Cry Luison</h4>
<div>
This episode was supposed to explain schizophrenia in a whole new way, but I didn't like the end explanation. However I liked the new wolf-Wesen, though with the enormous ears it looked more like a fennec fox than a wolf. I also was glad they brought back the key storyline for a moment, and brought Josh back.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h2>
Highway of Tears</h2>
<div>
This episode was downright awesome. First off, there actually is a place called the Highway of Tears. It is in British Columbia, I think route 406, and many women have been murdered or disappeared from there the 1990's to 2011. This episode shows that Portland has its own Highway of Tears, also on route 406. Now I think the naming of the episode was intentional.</div>
<div>
However the main topic of the episode was Nick's regrimming. Renard's mom has made the potion to reverse what Adalind has done to Nick. This episode Juliette and Nick finally decided to do it. So, Juliette was Adalind, and they had sex. What was nice is that they had fun with it. It wasn't awkward for them, they seemed to enjoy it in a strange way.</div>
<div>
Meanwhile, Renard's mother, Elizabeth, left. It was kind of sad, because Elizabeth was great, and I really enjoyed having her on the show. Or maybe it's because British people are so cool. Whatever the reason, I want to see her again. It seems like we will, as now she is joining the hunt for the Royal baby, though she just wants to see her granddaughter. Also, she mentioned Malleus Malleficurum, Hammer of the Witches. I learned that from Supernatural first.</div>
<div>
Meanwhile, it seems like Chavez won't leave the show, even when she doesn't appear. She didn't appear in this episode, but we did see an agent of hers, this Pflichttreue named Mann, who was watching Trubel. I hope we see Chavez again, because I want to know what this organization is that she belongs to.</div>
<div>
And finally, the case of the week. Every three years, Phansigar's, a komodo dragon like Wesen that appears to be a variation of the Skalengeck, kidnap a young couple, then sacrifice them to Kali. They use their long tongues to choke the poor couple into silence, then bury them alive. What is interesting is that now it appears that the first case Nick worked on was Wesen! Even when he was human he had the weird cases. And the big reveal, Rudyard Kippling was a Grimm! I actually never heard of him until this episode.</div>
<div>
And now back to Nick. After having sex with Adalind/Juliette, nothing happened. But then things started. At the precinct, while some people were trying to restrain an angry perp, Nick saw him, but he could see his whole face woge. Some distortion in the jaw and the teeth kept changing back and forth. I was in shock when that happened. So something is happening. Later, when digging to find a welded model of Kali at a crime scene, Nick heard them hit the model as if he was right there. So, he got his super hearing that he gained from the Jinnamuru Xunte back in Season 2 Episode 15 back. And then came another surprise. When he Monroe, and Hank came to the salvage yard, and Hank and Monroe tried to get the kidnapped people from the pits, Nick turned gray. Zombie gray! He got his zombie powers back! Oh, but that was nothing compared what came next. The two Phansigars brought Nick, delirious and unable to react, to their father, also a Phansigar. The father woged, and then Nick saw his face! He saw his face! HE SAW HIS FACE WOGE!!! What followed is probably the most memorable series of quotes from Nick. "You're done." At this point I giggled like a fangirl. The Phansigar, JP, wrapped his tongue around Nick to choke him, but oh, you are so stupid JP! Nick unwrapped the tongue from his neck without much effort, and then sent JP off the screen in a single frame with a well aimed uppercut to his chin, and, in the process, ripped off his tongue! He got up, and the other two Phansigars woged.</div>
<div>
"You're a Grimm."</div>
<div>
"Yeah. I am." And then Nick proceeds to kick ass in a way that we have not seen him do in a while. The Phansigars never stood a chance against him! So, there you go, our Grimm is back! Yay! Oh, and Josh also came.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h2>
The Grimm Who Stole Christmas</h2>
<div>
Last night's episode was good fun. It was by far the funniest episode of this dark, dark series that has aired yet. It was a bit early for them to air their Christmas special, but I thought that this one, and their last Christmas special, were both great. I loved, loved, loved, the Kallikantzaroi! These little guys were so much fun to watch, they were almost meant to be comical! These little Wesen are actually teenagers of Indole Gentile, another type of Wesen, but as they grow they turn from goblin to benign Wesen. From Christmas decoration trashers, to, I don't know, Greek people?</div>
<div>
There were several incredibly funny moments in this episode: </div>
<div>
1. When Nick and Hank go to a house that is having their house trashed, one of the goblins is on the roof, and throws an ornament at the two detectives, but misses, falls, and slide off the roof! Then, Nick and Hank come to check on it, and it gets up, and leaps onto his back, followed by Hank just knocking it out!</div>
<div>
2. "Hmmm. Now there is actually a reason for fruitcake."</div>
<div>
3. Rosalee smacking one over the head with a frying pan.</div>
<div>
4. "We need the whole truck."</div>
<div>
Overall, Kallikantzaroi are one of my favourite Wesen. The rest of the episode was great too. However, when Trubel learned Josh wanted to go back home and fight the Verrat, Trubel wouldn't let him go alone. It was very sad to see her go, but I am sure she will return soon. Overall, and very nice episode, and it looks like next week will be even better!</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-26343160280951648302014-11-01T09:21:00.000-07:002014-11-01T09:21:53.436-07:00Grimm: "Thanks for the Memories" & "Octopus Head" Duel ReviewBack in May I posted my absolutely uncensored review and my reactions to the season 3 finale of Grimm. I couldn't wait that long I said. Well, thanks to watching lots and lots of Doctor Who, Torchwood, and Supernatural, the wait went by faster than expected. Now, I waited until the second episode aired, because it is a two-part story, and I wanted to review it all at once. The one thing I loved about these first two episodes is that unlike the season 3 premire episodes, not every cliffhanger was resolved in the first two episodes. In fact, only one was resolved here. The others are far, far from being done, and several more have built up.<br />
<br />
So, let's review the cliffhangers again shall we?<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #1: Renard is in Hospital</b><br />
I really was worried about this one. Sasha Roiz's, the actor who plays Renard, contract was running out. If he didn't sign it, Renard would be killed off. Well, at the end of Thanks for the Memories, he was killed off, at 1:34 pm. Thus he joins to be the first major character who dies. However, a blonde woman arrives at the end of the episode and sees this. At the very start of Octopus Head, she comes in and does one of the most supernatural things ever seen on the show. She stops time. Yes, that's right, the woman stops everything around her. She then pulls out a snake with a head on both ends, the snake bites Renard and her, and she revives him that way. So, Renard is not dead now, but has joined Nick in being one of only two characters who have died, and both are still kicking. I expect at least one of them to die again sometime and be revived again, or that's just me watching too much Supernatural.<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #2: A Decapitated FBI Agent at Nick's Home</b><br />
The way this situation was handled was very smart. I thought this would spell the end for Trubel. However, this isn't. Nick and Trubel told the police and FBI the truth, except about why Renard came to see Nick, and about Steward being a Hundjäger. Because they told everything as the truth, they got away thankfully. However, this investigation is leaving a whole bunch of unanswered questions.<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #3: Wu Sees a Grimm Diary</b><br />
We last saw Wu looking at the Grimm Diaries, and now he is seen at the beginning of Thanks for the Memories flipping through them. He tries to tell Hank about this, but Hank tries to shrug it off. However, I like how instead all the other times, where Wu just accepts it gullibly, he is not convinced Hank is telling the truth. He is way too smart to just accept the BS they are using to cover up stuff. He is very close. Not just that, but he is becoming suspicious about Trubel too. In Octopus Head, he looks at a security camera from a fast food restaurant, and sees Trubel there. This was in relation to a case where Trubel was the murderer of several Wesen. ("Nobody Knows the Trubel I've Seen") So, he is very smart to go up at the end of Octopus Head and confront Nick about this. However, something happens to Nick (see the last section of this post to find out what) and he is left dangling. However, it doesn't seem like he is going to give up on this, and this means two things: one, it is now inevitable that he will be introduced to the Grimm world, it's just a matter of when. Two: we will be seeing more Wu! It is exciting, as last season we had two Wucentric episodes, "Mommy Dearest", and "Once We Were Gods". I can't wait to see what season 4 has in store for Wu.<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #4: Nick and Juliette</b><br />
The producers and writers said that things would be much different for the couple. However, I was expecting some sort of "we're breaking up" type of reaction from Juliette. In case you forgot, Adalind took the form of Juliette, and had sex with him. However, these first two episodes, the couple reacted like a regular couple would in their situation and they are working together on this. Nick offers to sleep on the couch, but Juliette said that they aren't "going down that road again". They've already been through so much crap already, they deserve a break. This actually ties into the next and biggest cliffhanger of all.<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #5: A Grimmless Nick</b><br />
Is Nick going to get his powers back? Or, should we put it like this based on how he has acted in Thanks for the Memories and Octopus Head, does he want his powers back? Nick and Juliette think it could be a good thing, as they would not be in so much danger anymore. However, for Nick, it will be harder to solve crimes now, and despite Trubel being his eyes for the Grimm world, he doesn't like that. From next week's episode preview, it seems like he will be pushed to his human limits to decide if he wants them back or not.<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #6: The Cure!!!!</b><br />
Even though Juliette told Monroe and Rosalee to give them time to decide, the two now married couple are still trying to find a cure for this, yet even they are stumped. Renard is in no condition to help, but this new woman who saved his life is. This woman is Renard's mother. Finally, she arrives. She will be helping to find a cure for this, but then the question comes, does he want the cure? That may be the question that will come up a lot more later in the season.<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #7: Adalind's Search</b><br />
Adalind thinks Viktor has her baby, (watch "The Law of Sacrifice" for the full mishpuha) and so goes to Vienna to see her baby. However, she is heartbroken when Viktor instead puts her into a dungeon cell. I am conflicted here. I feel bad for her loss, but at the same time I want her to die in lava for what she did to Nick. I am curious to see how this unfolds, especially her creepy cell buddy who sounds like a Fuchsteufelwild and sounds insane (literally).<br />
<br />
<b>The Other Crap</b><br />
Some other stuff to point out. One is how the hell did Elizabeth (Renard's mother) stop time? I know Hexenbiests can make powerful potions, but this has got to take the cake for the most powerful potion or spell I've ever seen. This means Hexenbiests have gotten much, much higher on the ranking of the most powerful Wesen. It seems like she is even more powerful than Adalind.<br />
<br />
Something happened at the end of Octopus Head that surprised me. One of the FBI agents investigating Nick's house is a Steinadler, an eagle-like Wesen. She becomes suspicious of both Nick and Trubel, but then targets Trubel solely. At the end of Octopus Head, Trubel is kidnapped by the agent, Chavez. I think she is not working for the FBI, just like Steward. Either she just hates Grimms or was sent by the Verrat like Steward. Either way, she doesn't seem like a good Wesen at all, duh, she just kidnapped someone.<br />
<br />
Another very interesting event unfolded at the same time as Trubel's kidnapping. When Wu was questioning Nick about Trubel, he and Adalind began to have painful headaches, and briefly, they looked at each others vision. So, Adalind looked through Nick's eyes and saw Wu and Juliette, and Nick saw through Adalind's eyes at a dungeon with rats. This is just odd. The simple solution of just killing Adalind probably wouldn't work, they are much more connected to each other than either of them would have guessed.<br />
<br />
And then the new Wesen in town, the Gedächtnis Esser. Seriously, he is one of the coolest Wesen we have seen in a while. He kept me guessing who he was from the moment he appeared to his arrest. At first we are introduced to him as being Lawrence Anderson, but in Octopus Head, Lawrence Anderson is found dead with the markings for a Gedächtnis Esser on the back of his head. So, the guy isn't even Lawrence Anderson! What he did to the people that worked on the CVA project, a highly classified military project, is just terrible, piercing the backs of their skulls with his tentacles and stealing everything from them, every memory, they don't even know their own names! Once he handcuffs Trubel, it is clear he is very, very intimidating. Trubel, a Grimm, was absolutely out of her mind scared when he was talking her. And just to add the fear he produced, when he tapped her forehead while talking about where memories are stored, she flinched back really far. Now, the fear he induced in her is probably very impressive for a Wesen, but the fear she induced on him is even worse. Trubel fights him (while handcuffed, showing once more Grimms are badass) and he begins to feed on her memories. However, as he does, he learns she is a Grimm, and immediately stops and starts a severe mental breakdown. Because Gedächtnis Esser have somewhat eidetic memory, when he just subconsciously thinks about her memories, he screams. This goes to show that even the most feared Wesen are scared of Grimms. However, scared isn't even a good word to describe this. The fact is he looked into her memory, and because he saw the things she did to Wesen, that amplified the fear. It wasn't just her being a Grimm, but him looking at what she did by looking at her memories, that gave him a severe traumatic experience.<br />
<br />
In the end, the first two episodes where some of the strongest episode I've seen in a while, and I cannot wait to see how this all goes. I am particularly excited to see their Golem episode, and their Christmas special this year, which features Kallikantzaroi. I hope Season 4 is as good or better than Season 3, and I don't think I'll be disappointed.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-45275911966442483152014-09-21T12:30:00.005-07:002014-09-21T12:30:56.005-07:00The Spinosaurus and the (Not So Small?) LegsI was going to do a full post on Spinosaurus, but now that there has been so much more controversy with the leg size, I am going to spend a lot more time on the post now. That being said I do have an opinion on this and when I return I am doing a very thorough review of evidence and I'll outline my conclusions. This could take a while, and even then I might change my mind if new evidence comes to light on the issue.<br />
<br />
Did that make any sense? Well, short of it is, I will have a full post on Spinosaurus soon, and I was goong to post it today, but I thought twice, and it's best to spend more time. The next post will be on Spinosaurus, and my opinions (some of which are a little, well, not generally excepted by most people). Until then, wait...Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-51736175869462542762014-08-23T12:23:00.000-07:002014-08-23T12:23:08.734-07:00Spinosaurus Is Weird<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://luisvrey.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/spinosaurus_inline.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://luisvrey.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/spinosaurus_inline.png" /></a></div>
This tiny picture is all that we have for the new Spinosaurus. This dinosaur never ceases to amaze me. It is most well known in that is beat up Tyrannosaurus in Jurassic Park 3, and of course, that fight could not have happened like that for multiple reasons, and these new discoveries seem to make it even more implausible. It turns out, Spinosaurus had a dip in the sail, sort of like Ichthyovenator. What is also shows is the arms are small, but the legs are tiny, yet probably robust. It would seem implausible that such a huge animal was supported by tiny legs like those. It would make it do a face plant on land, but in water it seems like the best way to get around. The feet appear to be small, so maybe not swimming, but possibly walking on the river bed. This shows that Spinosaurus really is more aquatic than we ever assumed.<br />
<br />
To counterbalance the heavy front end, it would need a massively long tail. So, it seems like it was more than just semi-aquatic. However, that leaves a burning question: how could it have walked? If its feet were tiny, how? was reading a discussion on the Dinosaur Toy Forum about this, and some people gave some suggestions of how. As said above, it could have had a long tail to counterbalance it. Another person gave the suggestion of maybe it splayed its legs slightly to spread its weight. I find the former more plausible, but the feet are small. However it did walk, it would look awkward, and otherworldly.<br />
<br />
But, this is not really news. It has been online for about a year now, but for some reason finally became big this year. A few interesting things as well. Paul Sereno, who discovered the new remains, said that the above picture is inaccurate. So, that begs the question, what is inaccurate about it? Did its sail not have an impression? Were its feet actually normal sized? That we won't know, until the paper can be published. Until then, we will continue to speculate the habits of this remarkable creature.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-43945406266698723652014-08-15T11:14:00.000-07:002014-08-15T11:14:01.343-07:00The Leaellynasaura TheoryOut of all the times in Earth's history, the most interesting was the Cretaceous, second was the Permian. Out of all the countries in the Cretaceous, Australia was the most interesting. It is full of surprises, and animals that live nowhere else on Earth. And out of all those animals in Australia, one was adapted to the polar conditions, better than any in my opinion. My all time favourite dinosaurs; <i>Leaellynasaura amcigraphica</i>. This post is dedicated to my most interesting of ornithopods.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2014/226/9/7/polar_survival_by_alexornisantecedens-d7v7quj.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2014/226/9/7/polar_survival_by_alexornisantecedens-d7v7quj.jpg" height="262" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<i>Leaellynasaura </i>is known from little material, a skull and some tail vertebra. But we know a few interesting things from those isolated fossils. The skull housed a huge eye, and it was very useful for seeing in the dark, which would last up to five months, since Australia was connected to Antarctica. The tail is the defining feature of <i>Leaellynasaura. </i>It is three times longer than the head neck and body combined. So, what could it have been used for? Well, we need to look at the environment at the time. There were no polar ice caps in the Cretaceous, but the early Cretaceous did experience some cold temperatures, especially compared to the late Cretaceous, which was incredibly warm. Because of the presence of trees, that the climate was warmer than Antarctica today, but it wasn't implausible that it didn't snow of get below freezing. With this, we can speculate what the tail is used for. Because it's very long, we can imagine it being bushy, and so <i>Leaellynasaura</i> likely had feathers (<i>Kulindadromeus</i>). If the feathers didn't protect it from the cold, they could use their bushy tail to wrap around the body, and keep it warm. This is further supported by the fact that the tail was very, very flexible, and not stiff, easily capable of wrapping around its body. The tail may also have been used as a decoy. If a predator were to attack, they could make themselves bigger than they are by puffing up their tails. They could also use it in sacrifice to save its body. Confuse the predator to go for the tail, and not the body.<br />
<br />
But the rest of the post is going to be my speculation on the rest of <i>Leaellynasaura. </i>We don't have a rest of the body, especially the arms and feet, so I am going to use wild speculation. I don't think it's implausible that little Leaellyn had wide feet to navigate through the snow. The feet wouldbe fully feathered of course, and be used like snowshoes. And it's legs would be the most powerful part of little Leaellyn's body. The arms may have been tiny, almost vestigial, with little use. Of course, we have no evidence for the second part, but sometimes Polar Animals evolve bizarre features for apparently no reason.<br />
<br />
In the end, we may never know about little <i>Leaellynasaura</i>, but in the end, it really is the most interesting dinosaur of all. With the longest tail length in comparison of it's body of all dinosaurs, it surely will not be mistaken by the generic ornithopods.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-78600258609016630502014-08-04T21:53:00.002-07:002014-08-04T21:53:55.225-07:00Kulindadromeus Changes the WorldFirst off, I know I am late to this. Now, since last year, there was rumour of an ornithischian from Siberia with feathers. It was called "Kulindodromeus". Well, it is finally described, but is called "Kulindadromeus". This has got to be the coolest thing going on here. As an ornithschian with feathers, this little herbivore has provided the best evidence that all dinosaurs had some sort of feathering. What is more, is that the earliest dinosaurs had feathers. Ornithischians and saurischians evolved not long after the first dinosaurs appeared. So feathers probably evolved before that split occured.<br />
<br />
You also have pycnofibers on pterosaurs, and the ancestors pterosaurs split off before the first ancestors of dinosaurs appeared. Feather like filaments probably evolved in the early Triassic, before that pterosaur/dinosaur split occured. However, before we say that this is absolutely true, we have to do some sort of skeptical work. Some people have suggested that feather like structures evolved several times in the dinosaur line. However, I don't think so. I think that these feather-like filaments on Kulindadromeus are homologous with those on theropod dinosaurs. While we have the best evidence of an entire line of feathered animals to date, the final proof would probably be a very early dinosaur with feathers.<br />
<br />
This also had me think about feathered sauropods. Before this, I never really thought sauropods were feathered. But, it had me thinking. Sauropods are saurischians, and the majority of feathered dinosaurs are saurischians. My very speculative theory, is that when born, young sauropodlets possessed downy feathers, like those of a newborn chick. However, overtime, I think that the young gradually lost the majority of feathers, with only their feet having feathers when fully grown. I have no proof of this, but it is entirely possible. Also, this is further proof of endothermy in dinosaurs (not that it needed much more proof), and that endothermy goes even further back on the archosaur line than thought. Also, crocodiles have dormant feather producing genes, and this seems to support that too.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-26721092875388988272014-06-14T21:42:00.000-07:002014-06-14T21:42:47.714-07:00Non-Avian Dinosaurs, Endothermy, and MesothermyWell, I have been very interested in this latest news item. However, I have a very strong opinion on this, and so this will be the longest post thus far. The item is that dinosaurs were not warm-blooded or cold-blooded, but something in between, called mesothermy. A lot of people are now taking it at face value. I am not. The study used growth rates to show that dinosaurs were mesothermic. The study said that the growth rates are similar to ectothermic sauropsids. Before I go on to talk about the evidence for warm-bloodedness, I have to say this just once, a quote from the paper. "Large dinosaurs, like sauropods, probably had limited parental care during breeding and probably non after hatching. Therefore, high metabolic rates seem unlikely in sauropods." This is using the fact that ectothermic animals don't care for their young. It seems to be a strong correlation, but I have a problem with this quote. The point is, non-avian dinosaurs are not around anymore. It is possible that an extinct animal could be endothermic and still not care for its young. Look at the megapodes. They are birds, and they don't care for their young. They just drop the eggs and go, and let the young live on their own.<br />
<br />
I have more than just that problem with the study. I have compiled a list of evidence for endothermy in non-avian dinosaurs:<br />
<br />
<h4>
Evidence #1: Air Sacs</h4>
<div>
Birds lungs obtain fresh air when exhaling and inhaling, because the air sacs pump and the lungs absorbs the oxygen. They need this for a high active lifestyle. We find signs of air sacs in some fossil dinosaurs, the most famous example being Aerostean, an allosaur, who has very bird like air sacs. In addition, ceratosaurs, coelurosaurs, and the early theropod Coelophysis have been found with evidence of air sacs. This suggests that they have a very high active lifestyle.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Evidence #2: Uncinate Processes</h4>
<div>
Uncinate Processes are spurs on the hind edges of birds ribs, giving the chest muscles more leverage when pumping the chest to improve oxygen supply. The size of these spurs are all depending on the bird's lifestyle and oxygen requirements. Non-avian maniraptoran dinosaurs have these spurs, and are similar to those in diving birds, indicating they need a high-capacity oxygen supply. These spurs have been found in Thescelosaurus, an ornithischian as well.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Evidence #3: Growth</h4>
<div>
The one thing that this new study used to prove mesothermy, and I think is not correct. When comparing the growth rate of dinosaurs to modern animals, you get numbers similar to this:</div>
<div>
0.22 Kilograms - Slower than marsupials</div>
<div>
1-20 kilograms - Similar to marsupials, slower than precocial birds</div>
<div>
100-1000 kilograms - Faster than marsupials, similar to precocial birds, slower than placentals</div>
<div>
1500-3500 kilograms - Similar to most placentals</div>
<div>
25000 kilograms and higher - very fast similar to whales</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
This all depends on the size of the dinosaurs used to compare the animals. I see how you can tell metabolism of an animal, but it seems pretty difficult to see if it is endothermic or ectothermic.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Evidence #4: Posture and Gait</h4>
<div>
When it comes to what metabolism dinosaurs had, you can use their gait as an indication of it, because you get an idea of what lifestyle they had, and what requirements metabolically it would have. Reptiles (not counting snakes) have sprawled legs, are also ectothermic. You see the sprawled legs in the platypus as well, but it is endothermic. Dinosaurs have an upright, erect posture. This hints at a more active lifestyle.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Evidence #5: Feathers</h4>
<div>
This is the second biggest argument for endothermic dinosaurs. Some covering on the animals body would be big proof of endothermy. In the study, they ignored that, and even used Archaeopteryx. Yes, it had a slower metabolism than most birds, does not necessarily mean mesothermy. Feathers are also very useful, to not only warm an animal up, but to cool it down as well. They had control over their body temperature, and the only other animals alive today with feathers are avian dinosaurs, the birds. Are they mesothermic? No, they are endothermic. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Evidence #6: Polar Dinosaurs</h4>
<div>
This is in my opinion, the biggest argument for endothermy. An ectotherm in a cold environment, would be incredibly sluggish, and probably die easily. However, as evident in many birds and mammals, endotherms have no problems. With land based polar endotherms, you have a thick coating of fur of feathers keeping you warm. In the icy waters, you have blubber keeping you fat and warm. With a mesotherm, you would be not able to tolerate the cold as well as endotherms. An argument could be made that dinosaurs could have hibernated. However, animals like Leaellynasaura, and Troodon, show no signs of hibernation, or torpor. What the dinosaurs probably used was a lot of feathers, and blubber. I am aware leatherback sea turtles swim in the Arctic circle, but are they actually adapted for that cold of an environment?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Evidence #7: Diversity</h4>
<div>
While it may not seem like it, diversity is probably because of an endothermic lifestyle. Modern lizards, snakes, amphibians, and crocodilians are diverse, but not the level of non-avian dinosaurs. From therizinosaurs to pachycephalosaurs. Sauropods, hadrosaurs, Leaellynasaura (squee!) ceratopsians, tyrannosaurs, ect. Dinosaurs used to dominate the world. If they were endothermic, they would be able to quicker adapt to their environments, and expand and diversify into all shapes and sizes. It seems like one thing that makes dinosaurs famous also lends credence to endothermy.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
In conclusion, I am glad we have a term for "lukewarm-blooded" or "not cold-blooded, not warm-blooded". Mesothermy. I like it. Mesothermy. Mesothermy. However, I disagree with the methods they used, and the ultimate conclusions. I will say this however. If any of the dinosaurs where to be endothermic, it would be, with no question, the theropods. If any of the dinosaurs were to be mesothermy, they would be the sauropods, early dinosaurs, and larger ornithischians. </div>
<div>
I am no expert, and have done a lot of research, so don't get angry if I get something wrong. Let me know. Until next time!</div>
<h4>
Sources</h4>
<div>
<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2006.00019.x/abstract;jsessionid=952B3F2F4083DA18683B9ADE274CCA96.f01t04">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2006.00019.x/abstract;jsessionid=952B3F2F4083DA18683B9ADE274CCA96.f01t04</a></div>
<div>
<a href="http://jeb.biologists.org/content/210/22/3955.abstract">http://jeb.biologists.org/content/210/22/3955.abstract</a></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-82839653704865050612014-05-19T17:17:00.002-07:002014-05-19T17:17:24.222-07:00Several Good Reasons Not To See "Jurassic World"For more than a decade now, there have been talks of a Jurassic Park 4. Finally, it seems like it's coming, and, well, to put it lightly, sounds like total crap. Here are a list of several great reasons not to go see Jurassic World.<br />
<br />
<h4>
Reason 1: The Park Activities</h4>
<div>
So, apparently, there is going to be a dinosaur petting zoo and a ride that gets up close to the dinosaurs. Oh, boy. <i>A ride getting close to the dinosaurs is so harmless! Nothing can go wrong. </i>Watch Jurassic Park (the original). That idea didn't work, and they weren't even close to the dinosaurs. Also, a dinosaur petting zoo sounds a little better, but really? Please don't have corny awful jokes. Please don't have anything like… ah whatever…</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Reason 2: Tamed Dinosaurs</h4>
<div>
Okay, so some dinosaurs are tamed. Retarded. I guess you could tame them, but this sounds lame. But we are devoid of how trained they are, so I shouldn't really say anything just yet (oops). It's the third reason that makes this ridiculous. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Reason 3: "Good Dinosaurs" vs. "Bad Dinosaurs"</h4>
<div>
*<i>Screams at the top of lungs*.</i> Hello! There is no good or bad in nature! It's just the way things are! Stop doing that and humanizing things by saying "there are good dinosaurs and bad dinosaurs. The bad ones are always carnivores and always do nothing but cause mayhem because race car. And herbivores are always harmless." Okay, sorry, had to vent. I am aware that the article says that the raptors (dromaeosaurs…) and T-rex (T.rex) are among the good trained dinosaurs. So, basically, all the bad dinosaurs are untrained. Not always true. And this is leading up to the number one reason not to go see the movie.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Reason 4: Hybrid Dinosaur</h4>
<div>
So, last year, Jack Horner, the paleontological advisor for the film, teased about a new very scary dinosaur that will "keep your lights on after the movie." So what was it? Was it Balaur? Was it Siats? Was it Qianzhousaurus or some new dinosaur? No, it was a fantasy dinosaur! I bet the creators were in a meeting and were like, "So, how are we going to top Spinosaurus? Oh, I know, how about we create a hybrid because that's cool!" No, sorry, it's not. It is really just a hybrid of a raptor, a T.rex (already implausible) a snake, and a cuttlefish. First off, that is the lamest hybrid ever. Second, there are so many other <i>real </i>dinosaurs to choose from. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<h4>
Reason 5: No Feathers!!!!!!!</h4>
<div>
Even before the news of the other four reasons where released, the director released a Twitter comment that there will be "no feathers". So, ignore all of the science that has been made since the original film and show people misinformation. I understand the majority of people will say to all these reasons "it's just a movie. People know it's not real." Unfortunately, some people will think that the dinosaurs are real, and it will really hurt the now gaining popularity that raptors and other coelurosaurs were feathered. Thank you so much Jurassic World! Thank you so much!</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
So, five quick reasons. There you go. If you do see it, then either have fun, or bask in the misinformation and pseudoscience. If not, then watch all the chaos that will ensue from this.</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-59563277366218099132014-05-18T11:25:00.000-07:002014-05-18T11:25:02.766-07:00How Scary Azhdarchids Really AreThe dinosaurs really cover up what I think are much cooler animals. The pterosaurs. The dinosaurs take all the fame, but pterosaurs are really interesting. Of all the pterosaurs however, azhdarchids are the scariest and most interesting of all. I find them my favourite pterosaurs and particularly interesting for many reasons. So, this post is dedicated to my number one favourite pterosaurs, the azhdarchids.<br />
<br />
<h4>
From Skim Feeders to Cursorial Predators</h4>
<div>
When azhdarchids were first found, we assumed they were just like any other pterosaur. We thought that pretty much all pterosaurs were fish eaters. However, we know that's not the case. We have flightless pterosaurs, like Sos 2428, and the frugivorous tapejarids, the aerial predators like Harpactognathus, and then we have azhdarchids. At first, because of their long spear like beaks, we thought they were skim feeders, kind of like the skimmers, which are birds that have a longer lower jaw and a shorter upper jaw, which they use for skimming the water until they catch fish. In fact, many pterosaurs, including Rhamphorhynchus were thought to fish like this, but we know know that it probably isn't likely. The same goes for the azhdarchids. There are several problems that go with this idea:</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
1. Azhdarchids have long, inflexible necks, and their jaws are not like those of modern day skimming birds.</div>
<div>
2. There have been no fossils of azhdarchids found in marine deposits, all in terrestrial (sometimes arid) environments.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Others suggested they were scavengers, but their jaws are also not like those of scavenging animals. So, what were they doing? In 2008, a paper was published by Mark Witton, and Darren Naish, arguing that azhdarchids were cursorial predators, possibly preying upon baby dinosaurs! In fact, their long limbs and unspecialized beaks suggest that they filled a niche similar to storks. In addition, there is evidence that azhdarchids traveled in groups when they stalked the ground. As if that isn't scary enough, these guys probably could run! Not waddle, but, RUN! They may have even taken on prey about the size of humans! So imagine a group of the biggest flying vertebrates on Earth chasing you down! Scary, huh?</div>
<div>
An interesting note is that some inland late Cretaceous communities which have large azhdarchids were absent of midsize dinosaur predators. This suggests they actually filled the role of midsize predators in some areas!</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
So, this is a short post basically listing the reasons why azhdarchids are my favourite pterosaurs. If I do get something factually wrong, just tell me and I'll change it. I'm still getting used to this. Anyways, until next time!</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">References</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/.U3j238ZK7Xs">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/.U3j238ZK7Xs</a></span></div>
<div>
<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0002271"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0002271</span></a></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-33245778369553164482014-05-16T23:02:00.001-07:002014-05-16T23:02:45.426-07:00Grimm, Season Finale Review: Blond Ambition<b>Warning: Contains Massive Spoilers and Language</b><br />
<br />
The first season finale, we had the unexpected revelation that Nick's mom is alive and Juliette is on a coma. Second season finale, we were unsure what would happen to Juliette, Rosalee, and Monroe at the container yard, and Nick was zombified by Baron Samedi and put into a coffin. This season finale is just way to fucked up to explain at once, so, let's go and see the cliffhangers.<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #1 - Renard is Shot and Dead</b><br />
So the bastard FBI Hundjäger Weston Steward did get him. Three shots! The good news is it didn't hit him in the heart. But last we saw he was coughing blood out of his nose. So, is he dead, or is he not? Of course, he probably isn't, but then again, there can be surprises in store.<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #2 - A Decapitated FBI Agent in Nick's Home</b><br />
After Weston shot Renard down he started to shoot at Trubel, who went into her room. Weston broke in and woged. Then, Trubel,grabs her machete, and promptly uses it to make his head fling all the way down the stairs. Nick going to be in a lot of trouble. How are you going to explain a decapitated FBI Agent in your home!?<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #3 - Wu Sees a Grimm Diary</b><br />
As Wu goes into Trubel's room, he notices the Grimm books and reads an entry, which has a Wesen in it, and a picture of a man decapitating it. Wu remembers his experience of seeing the Aswang, and clearly looks very disturbed. Will he find out next season.<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #4 - Nick and Juliette</b><br />
So, Juliette is not happy. That's it. Oh, you want more? Okay. Here it is! Adalind impersonates Juliette, and she bangs Nick, and Juliette doesn't remember that, and now is mad that Nick (unknowingly) cheated on her and she can't have a boyfriend who is a Grimm. Too dangerous.<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #5 - Nick Looses His Grimm Powers</b><br />
So, because he banged Adalind/Juliette, he can no longer see Wesen. No black eyes. He's a Human. And he was supposed to drink a... Oh, next one...<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #6 - The Cure!!!!</b><br />
HE WAS SUPPOSED TO DRINK A BOTTLE OF GREEN STUFF THAT WE DON'T KNOW WHATS IN IT AND IS TIME SENSITIVE!!! How are they going to do that?<br />
<br />
<b>Cliffhanger #7 - Viktor Doesn't Have Your Baby</b><br />
Last we saw Adalind, she was on a plane to see her baby with Viktor. How is Viktor going to handle the rathe of an angry mommy Hexenbiest? Not well I presume. This is going to be one hell of a scene...<br />
<br />
So, we have to wait until October for these to be resolved. God, fucking Adalind... That bitch... That damn bitch!!!!<br />
I'll die before October. I can't wait that long!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-20752076657286161092014-05-13T19:04:00.002-07:002014-05-13T19:04:46.360-07:00Grimm: Here Comes TrubelSo, three episodes combined into one post. First up:<br />
<br />
<b>Nobody Knows the Trubel I've Seen:</b><br />
The addition of a new Grimm is absolutely fantastic. This girl is totally off the wall in that she kills every Wesen she sees on sight, and thinks what she see's isn't real. Nick's interactions with her were very realistic, and he knows he needs to be her mentor, so that she doesn't kille every Wesen she spots. It was a great episode, and Viktor gave away the biggest plot twist of the season. Also, incredible playground fight scene, awesome job Toboni.<br />
<br />
<b>My Fair Wesen:</b><br />
So, continuing from the last episode, "Trubel" now stay at Nick's house while he mentors her. Also, the Wesen of the week, is not new, but still different. It is the leech-like Lebensauger (literally "life sucker", in German) who runs a shoplifting operation, in which he has three girls (one of whom is also a Lebensauger) and shoplift clothes for him. This leads to my inappropriate comment. Fucking creep! Before he turns into the slimey minion of Cthulhu, he just induces fear in the most incredibly creepy way, something I just can't describe. Then, he woges and gives you love bites around your mouth and neck, leaving toothy ring marks and no blood in you. When Trubel finally fought them, I was very happy. She kicked ass, and that Cthulhu minion deserved every punch, every kick, every ounce of pain she painfully put on him. Also, she does need training. Then, randomly, some old guy coughs and holds one of the SEVEN KEYS!!!<br />
<br />
<b>The Inheritance:</b><br />
One of my favourite episodes of the season. Trubel kicked ass, old guy was awesome, and Steward is still a bastard. As it turns out, the old dude, is another Grimm! He also have a ton of Grimm Diaries and stuff, including one of the seven keys. I was very upset that they completely ignored it until now, but I'm okay now. I loved the scene in the hospital room. You have teen Grimm (Trubel), middle-aged Grimm (Nick), and old Grimm (Rolek). Then, the fight scene in the parking lot was awesome. Trubel fights alongside Nick and Hank, until they kill two of the Verrat dudes, and then she kicks ass, and when she randomly threw one onto the ground, then they notice she's there. Followed by smashing the others head into a car window. Now that Nick has two keys, he will now be much more targeted, and more heads will roll.<br />
<br />
The season finale, <b>Blond Ambition</b>, is in two and a half days! I reallt can't wait, then I have to wait four months until Season 4. Until then folks!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-60404758862181184502014-05-13T17:38:00.001-07:002014-05-13T18:48:26.785-07:00What the Hell Deinocheirus?So, late last year, I did a post on the new remains of Deinocheirus. For nearly 60 years, all we knew was its arms. These giant ass arms. Some thought predator, others tought ornithomimosaur. As it turns out, it is the latter, and late last year the body was found. It showed Deinocheirus had a hump, like a camel. The only thing missing was it's head. The head was stolen by some poachers who smuggled it all the way back to Europe. There, authorities picked up the skull and now we know what it looks like. For a while, people assumed the weirdest Deinocheirus got was its hump. And all the evidence pointed it to be a tree browser; until now.... Now, the skull shows Deinocheirus is even weirder than we ever thought. It's a freaking ornithomimosaur trying to be a camel and a hadrosaur, really hard! <br />
<br />
Now I have seen a lot of comments on the internets that this could be a gaff, or misidentification, simply because it looks too much like a hadrosaur head. As far as I know, the skull was not faked, and from what the scientists said, it fit the rest of the body perfectly, thought how they do is something I want to know. The front half of the skull is hadrosaur. However, the eye sockets, and the rest of it is very ornithomimosaurian.<br />
So, what niche did it fill? This skull is not what you expect from a browser. And why is Deinocheirus in Nemegt? To get an idea of what nice it may have filled, lets review its contemporaries. We have the bizarre (not as much so as Deinocheirus) Therizinosaurus, who probably used its long claws to pull down branches from trees and strip the leaves, so its a browser. Then, we have Saurolophus, a hadrosaur, and it probably was a grazer. Deinocheirus has a hadrosaur skull, so that suggest grazer, but, hadrosaurs are very common. The niche is filled. What the heck is his niche!? Well, I have heard one theory, stating that Deinocheirus actually did not live in Nemegt, but came from other lands to explore. I'm not too sure about that, but I do think it is possible. I believe that it was a weird combination of browser and grazer, but hey, I'm no paleontologist, or deinocheirologist. I really am excited, and finally, we have solved one of the longest mysteries from Inner Mongolia. I want this hybrid creep to be a documentary this very minute now. No reason it shouldn't be.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-18650764877980507512014-05-02T23:06:00.000-07:002014-05-02T23:06:30.029-07:00Getting Caught Up with GrimmSo, I am reviewing eleven episodes into one post. But they'll be brief.<br />
<br />
<b>Episode 10 - Eyes of the Beholder</b><br />
A nice focus away from Nick and Adalind.<br />
<br />
<b>Episode 11 - The Good Soldier</b><br />
All I have to say is, MANTICORE FIGHT!!!<br />
<br />
<b>Episode 12 - The Wild Hunt</b><br />
The hunt was wild and Monroe's parents are morons.<br />
<br />
<b>Episode 13 - Revelation</b><br />
Most epic fight scene ever, (Nick and Monroe taking on three Wildesheers and getting their asses kicked while doing so)<br />
<br />
<b>Episode 14 - Mommy Dearest</b><br />
I had to wake up at 5:00 and be somewhere by 6:00. I went to sleep at 2:00. Thank you Reggie Lee for suggesting the Aswang. And making me fell sorry for Drew.<br />
<br />
<b>Episode 15 - Once We Were Gods</b><br />
Wesen Council and Beati Paoli.<br />
<br />
<b>Episode 16 - The Show Must Go On</b><br />
Umkippen, and RIP Sebaatien.<br />
<br />
<b>Episode 17 - Synchronicity</b><br />
One hell of a baby you made there Adalind. And hey Kelly, again,<br />
<br />
<b>Episode 18 - The Law of Sacrifice</b><br />
Damn, it feels wrong to say, "poor Adalind."<br />
<br />
Quick, right? I'll have a duel review on "Nobody Knows the Trubel I've Seen" and "My Fair Wesen" later. Just to prove I'm not dead.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-6377680027356462132014-01-25T16:50:00.003-08:002014-01-25T16:50:58.563-08:00Colouration of Mesozoic Marine Reptiles and the MediaOkay, I am currently very busy, and so I will not be able to post any more reviews of Grimm for a while. It's time I get back to dinosaurs.<br />
<br />
So, while I am late for this, the post will cover how the media can turn a cool discovery into a mess.<br />
<br />
So, earlier this month, the news that scientists found out the colour of extinct marine reptiles broke, and I was immediately excited at that finding. While I may be over exaggerating, it may be possible to find out the colour of most dinosaurs, not just feathered ones, but I don't have a degree so it's just wishful thinking on my part.<br />
<br />
A cool discovery, but there has been one little thing that nagged me all this time. A line I noticed from many press releases, including one by live science. It basically says "ancient marine reptiles where ALL black." ALL. Really? As far as I know, the scientists studied an ichthyosaur, some mosasaurs, and an extinct leatherback turtle. So, based off of these three data sets, all Mesozoic marine reptiles where black. Who's fault is it? It is the scientists? Or the media?<br />
My finger is firmly pointed at the media. I've never been a big fan of media reporting in general, but I particularly dislike their science reporting. Before I bash, I do know there are some good science reporters who do an excellent job at reporting. But many news sources have unfortunately fired their science reporters and instead have Bob who does the gardening section to cover the Higs-Boson.<br />
I's just the way that media works now, wether you like it or not. It's no longer about reporting information, it's about making press releases.<br />
<br />
It isn't just press releases on this story that made me angry. What made me real angry was some of the reporting that "Most dinosaurs weren't feathered", which I still am skeptical of.<br />
One of the headlines was "Feathered dinosaurs? For your dreams only." That made me both interested and greatly frustrated. Now from the headline, by the Free Press Journal, it seems like that feathered dinosaurs never existed. What the hell are they talking about?! It's only when you read it that you actually understand what they are talking about.<br />
<br />
On a quick side note, I will say that the feathered dinosaur press releases said that Triceratops was scaly, when in fact, an as of yet undescribed Triceratops was found with skin impressions, and clear impressions of quill like structures on them. That is just my pedantic aside.<br />
<br />
In the end, I wish that we couldn't have such sensationalistic headlines like "OMFG, WE WHERE WRONG ABOUT FEATHERED DINOSAURS!" But in the end, that's just my pedantic nature.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-67416595361069027962014-01-04T00:09:00.001-08:002014-01-04T00:09:28.854-08:00Grimm Season 3, Episode 9; Red Menace<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgg86l6FL0FgMrNgDDNA4EyN9SyoUPWjmWU-1mQy6uhRB9QN9BJOSDA6wz02ktfd9_k_45jBwQRTqXrtTNp0gvxV0VfjLDwpMOU3ngQCTh9klrHNpgz7aSS9pgztPJlJytfieKzEk5fb1k9/s1600/309-Quote.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="180" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgg86l6FL0FgMrNgDDNA4EyN9SyoUPWjmWU-1mQy6uhRB9QN9BJOSDA6wz02ktfd9_k_45jBwQRTqXrtTNp0gvxV0VfjLDwpMOU3ngQCTh9klrHNpgz7aSS9pgztPJlJytfieKzEk5fb1k9/s320/309-Quote.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
Well, a New Year, and Grimm returns with a new wonderful episode. This time, Grimm goes Russian. What I expected from this episode and what I got are both good and disappointing. We will start off with what is good.<br />
<br />
I love the new healing Wesen, the Koschie. They are so creepy, creepier than I originally thought they where going to be. The scene when the Koschie, Grigori, totally takes over his assassin by grabbing and twisting his wrist, and then giving him a lethal dose of radiation, is both creepy and incredibly thrilling. I mean come on! An assassin?! When was the last time we saw an assassin!? That's right, the Nuckelavee from Season 2, Episode 5, "The Good Shepherd", and Nick totally owned his ass! Also, just how cool would it be to be a Koschie? You get poisoned, and shot four times, and you still live! You get poisoned, and stabbed with a pair of scissors, and yet, you still live! Then again, it seems like when you use your healing powers, you yourself become weaker. Also, you can both heal, and then give someone radiation from hell. So, use it wisely!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcsWraxkKrrlalGrpXBxKB791IfN_soQkKN_aDI_SoKVJWLup_J7BxgIG3xLdBlZB_kG35BDB6xv4Dy0y7b7tEihTg0rgXbVIS2LiXxq5pWZhrDr3-ui6KlA0kMJCKE_R_Yx0WF4oFxIrw/s1600/Screen+shot+2014-01-03+at+11.49.19+PM.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="302" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcsWraxkKrrlalGrpXBxKB791IfN_soQkKN_aDI_SoKVJWLup_J7BxgIG3xLdBlZB_kG35BDB6xv4Dy0y7b7tEihTg0rgXbVIS2LiXxq5pWZhrDr3-ui6KlA0kMJCKE_R_Yx0WF4oFxIrw/s320/Screen+shot+2014-01-03+at+11.49.19+PM.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
He's staring into your soul...</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Another side plot that I found surprisingly interesting was Juliette's friend. She lives somewhere outside of Portland, and, is apparently, a Fuchsbau! And she is married with a Klaustreich! Still, Nick knows she is Wesen, but Juliette doesn't know. And nobody except Juliette's friend knows her husband is Wesen. That cliffhanger at the end is also very exciting. And by the looks of it in the promo, Juliette will face off against the Klaustreich and apparently kick his ass!</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The last time we saw a Klaustreich, was Season 1, Episode 16 "The Thing With Feathers". That time, the Klaustreich kept his wife, a very rare Wesen called a Seltenvogel, which produces a golden egg that is very valuable, and abused her and kept her just so he can get the egg. However, he failed, and Nick also took him down fairly easily.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
However, I have one negeative, even if it is. The second new Wesen in the episode was the Malin-Fatal. Originally, I read that it was a Siberian Tiger like Wesen, and I was excited with that prospect. Then, it turns out they are actually a warthog like Wesen. Either that source was wrong, or it was originally a Siberian Tiger, but then the writers or producers changed it to be a warthog. Either way, I still enjoyed the episode, the end of it was very unexpected. A great start to the new year, and next week looks like another great one!</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioepimz4wCAmjEDunyDv-YqOgRG7LCDPmaEZtszzl3_1lSfEq9QVT-GS4_WAR4qUBhdodk8ZSg33qNyhUo7yH-u1rwrXySo5FDRJYmQZatBGdpr4Dm_8ktFKgb7m8a5zVhUYeGblNvww9f/s1600/309-Malin_Fatal.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="301" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioepimz4wCAmjEDunyDv-YqOgRG7LCDPmaEZtszzl3_1lSfEq9QVT-GS4_WAR4qUBhdodk8ZSg33qNyhUo7yH-u1rwrXySo5FDRJYmQZatBGdpr4Dm_8ktFKgb7m8a5zVhUYeGblNvww9f/s320/309-Malin_Fatal.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Originally a Siberian Tiger....</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpDNPeI7RrylsXSA5afAJ-L0FvoOaeiXSo8vcOS_sXXXhfzEEx-XEqjcR2XkdNT2gMleM_KMGMlpwuIz0B7hIzdHlMGWBJQLfggUUay5mmYwArE03up-afy_eePHiwMZAC_nuGhLdHUS6D/s1600/309-Mr._Green_Eyes.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="203" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpDNPeI7RrylsXSA5afAJ-L0FvoOaeiXSo8vcOS_sXXXhfzEEx-XEqjcR2XkdNT2gMleM_KMGMlpwuIz0B7hIzdHlMGWBJQLfggUUay5mmYwArE03up-afy_eePHiwMZAC_nuGhLdHUS6D/s320/309-Mr._Green_Eyes.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
The almost invincible Wesen.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-25712036306856588752013-12-28T15:23:00.002-08:002013-12-28T15:24:07.801-08:00Merry Krampus (and a Grimm New Year)<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://static2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131214081032/grimm/images/c/c8/308-Krampus_tongue.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="174" src="http://static2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131214081032/grimm/images/c/c8/308-Krampus_tongue.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i>You better watch out, you'll probably cry, and I have a good reason to tell you why. Krampus is coming, to town.</i></div>
<br />
Well, I should have done this review before Christmas, but I am doing it now, and so it will be short. This Christmas special was absolutely creepy, and Krampus is probably my favourite paranormal creature on the show so far. Now I have read that NBC calls him a Wesen, and many people presume he is Wesen, but I disagree on several fronts. First, Silas Weir Mitchell in an interview said he is not Wesen, but his taxonomy is very confusing. Some people say that could have been before they found out he was Wesen. Another thing. If he is Wesen, why aren't there other Krampus' around? Or are there but they weren't mentioned? Some people say he is a special one of a kind Wesen, but I think there should be a boundary between what is and isn't Wesen. From what other people are saying, if something can Woge, it is Wesen. I don't think I agree. Remember, in Episode 3.6 "Stories We Tell Our Young", the boy was infected with a protozoan, otherwise known as the Grausen. He kind of woged, but he wasn't Wesen.<br />
<br />
This has many similarities between El Cucuy and La Llorona. Many people presume that El Cucuy was Wesen, because she could woge. Not only that, but (and this goes for El Cucuy too), if Krampus is Wesen, then how come he has been in Wesen mythology for so long? Centuries back, naughty kids where beat up, put into his sack, hanged from the highest tree, and then eaten on the winter solstice. If he was Wesen, then how come there aren't more of him around? It has been mentioned that there is only one Krampus. That is the one question that I believe shows he is not Wesen. This isn't a recent phenomenon. An argument could be made that Krampus and El Cucuy are just very special one of a kind Wesen who live for an incredibly long time. As far as I know, Wesen can be killed, and they don't live for ever. If that is true, then Krampus and El Cucuy are likely not Wesen, and they will exist as long as humans do.<br />
The only known two non-Wesen on the show have been La Llorona and Volcanalis. For La Llorona, she has existed for a very long time, and she doesn't really woge (or they never showed it, they did show her demonic form) and can travel from place to place in a blink of an eye, has hypnotic power with children, and always vanishes on Halloween.<br />
Now lets take that with Krampus. He has existed for a very long time, he does kind of woge, and seems to just know who is naughty and who is nice, and always disappears after the winter solstice. Another thing, Krampus has a sack of coal, from the north pole. How does someone get that much coal from the north pole? I believe for that reason that Krampus is not Wesen.<br />
<br />
Now, enought about the almost too confusing taxonomy of Krampus and the episode itself. I did get scared of Krampus, and I think they did a great job with him. I am glad I was a good boy this year, because I do not want to be whipped, put into a sac, hung from the tallest spot of the tallest tree, and then be eaten by a man dressed up as santa with a terrifying face, mountain goat horns, and an unexpected flaming red forked tongue that scared the living crap out of me!<br />
<br />
It did have it's flaws, and the writers could have made Krampus clearly non-Wesen, but I did enjoy the episode. I should also add this is the first time in a very long time that Nick fought against someone who was able to overpower him in a fight. Krampus didn't just match Nick, he positively kicked his butt in the second half of the fight.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-9014256243198976822013-12-22T20:04:00.003-08:002013-12-22T20:04:50.099-08:00Walking with Dinosaurs Review<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdKdzDni592qxASUDreg8y7B2HZ04OtBFYylzIXUQ3OTIz7P2BXQ9WXugVwC-mobqorsuNpxyihPbmIrJ5mYIP3QWsHhOWnaBX7vGJrsRgo3b5b_qB5Yb80U6eInQWoJnGY_1xj-uWrf8N/s1600/MV5BMjE2OTc2MTk1Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDg5NDU1MDE@._V1_SX640_SY720_.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdKdzDni592qxASUDreg8y7B2HZ04OtBFYylzIXUQ3OTIz7P2BXQ9WXugVwC-mobqorsuNpxyihPbmIrJ5mYIP3QWsHhOWnaBX7vGJrsRgo3b5b_qB5Yb80U6eInQWoJnGY_1xj-uWrf8N/s320/MV5BMjE2OTc2MTk1Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDg5NDU1MDE@._V1_SX640_SY720_.jpg" width="216" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
In 1997, a wonderful man came up with an idea for creating a new type of documentary on dinosaurs. Like you could go back in time and feel like you are actually watching these incredible animals live their lives. His name was Tim Haines. And so, he created one of the best ideas in television history. Not to view dinosaurs as dusty dirty old bones in the ground and in dingy museums, but to see them as real animals. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
It may be outdated and inaccurate, but <i>Walking with Dinosaurs </i>was to start a whole new generation of television making. Using animatronics and CGI to bring lost worlds to life. It was positively the spark that ignited the interest in dinosaurs for children, especially me. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
That being said, the recent movie adaption doesn't even give off an iota of light. Sadly, it is full of cliches, useless voice overs, and insults to the original series.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
Before I bash this movie repeatedly in the head with my words, I will talk about the positives. I was happy to see lesser known animals on the big screen, especially those who have never been depicted for the first time. Those include <i>Hesperonychus, Alphadon, Chirostenotes, </i>and <i>Parksosaurus. </i></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
The other cool part was about how accurate this film was. I have never been happier about an accurate depiction of dinosaurs than this. I enjoyed seeing feathered dinosaurs on screen, and they where correctly feathered. Primaries on the second finger, no noticeable shrink-wrapping, and no half-ass feathering. However, despite that there is one caveat that I will go into a little later in this post. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
I was also happy to see that none of the theropods had pronated hands. At least form what I saw. There where a few times when the hands kind of moved, but never full pronation. There could have been a few slip ups I didn't focus on, but for me it has past the accuracy test, not 100%, as paleontology always progresses, but I have never seen such an accurate depiction of dinosaurs anywhere.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
I also loved the colours on the animals. The dull patterns on the <i>Pachyrhinosaurus, Alphadon</i>, and <i>Quetzalcoatlus</i> where not impressive, but the <i>Hesperonychus</i> was beautifully coloured after the golden pheasant, <i>Alexornis</i> resembled an ivory-billed woodpecker, the <i>Gorgosaurus</i> was a beautiful iridescent blue, and <i>Troodon</i> resembled a hoatzin. However, the best, best animal of the entire film, was <i>Chirostenotes</i>, which was by far, the most beautiful feathered dinosaur I have ever seen! Oh boy was I laughing like a second grade girl when I saw them move!</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
The movie itself was also beautifully filmed, and the shots of the Alaskan and New Zealand landscapes where breathtaking, especially that brief shot of the north pole in space. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
The animation and CGI felt right in all places, and the interaction of the CGI animals and the live backdrop was also spot on. I also got to see it in 3D, and the 3D was absolutely breathtaking, and when two azhdarchids are pecking at the main characters eye, your eye is being pecked out too!</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
Unfortunately, all those positives above are no match to the enormous amount of negative to follow. Head bashing words are about to flood.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
This is an insult to the BBC series in everyway. It is marketed at one audience; children, and very young children at that. It is pretty evident in the annoyingly non-stop shitty voice-overs with terrible puns, shit and vomit jokes, and modern day uses.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
The voice overs where pretty needless, and while the main characters are slightly anthropomorphized, the voice overs seemed out of place with the animal like behaviour of the characters, and it really took me out of the film more than once. During the <i>Gorgosaurus</i> attack sequence, the voice overs where so frequent, I didn't really feel like the <i>Pachyrhinosaurus</i> where in peril, and that they had nothing to fear. Way to go with immersing your audience, Fox! However, I will say that the very brief second on the beach with the male and female <i>Pachyrhinosaurus</i>, with no voice overs and the female making a dinosaur noise was at least fun. However, the best part of the film was the moment of silence as the two <i>Pachyrhinosaurus</i> brothers where just sizing each other up, and it was just animal noises, for about 30 seconds. I wish the whole movie was like that!</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
At times it felt like the movie was having trouble deciding which genre it is. First it is paleontologist uncle wants to show nephews dinosaur bones, with the teenage boy not interested in dinosaurs and wants to text to friends (like I've encountered a teenage boy who hates dinosaurs), and then turns into family adventure, but then turns into educational movie, which then turns back into family adventure, but then turns into an educational movie, and then turns back into a family adventure, and then turns into documentary (not a very serious one), and then turns back into family adventure, ect, ect. By educational, I mean, everytime a new dinosaur or animal is encountered the movie pauses for a brief second, and has text on screen showing the animal's name, its meaning, and diet, which is then read in, get this, a kids voice! It's totally appealing to a wider audience! I was also disappointed that they indentified <i>Edmontonia </i>simply as, ankylosaur, because they thought the audience would confuse it with <i>Edmontosaurus </i>which is sort of excusable. But then, in some translation of the film, they could be saying <i>Ankylosaurus</i>! However, they just identified the <i>Quetzalcoatlus </i>in the film as, pterosaur. Not even azhdarchid. If it is because they though the audience couldn't pronounce it, then that's a pretty freaking young audience!</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
They could have worked that identification better in the script than pausing, and then you're not even sure if what's on screen in trustworthy, which it is! </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
The big problem is that the movie is trying to be something it isn't, and was never intended. A family film. From what I heard, it was originally designed as a silent film, with narration only coming in very briefly to provide continuity to the audience. That would have made it into the best dinosaur film of all time.... But oh, no! One freaking studio had to come in and stop the party, and say "Oh, shit! Kids will find this boring, lets add voice overs! And pop songs, and stop the movie so that people can hear a kid read out facts about a dinosaur- oh their not all dinosaurs? Whatever- and then say where reaching a wider audience!" That's basically what Fox did. Jeez, this is the film <i>Dinosaur</i> all over again, in more ways than one!</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
David Krentz was a character designer for both <i>Dinosaur </i>and <i>Walking with Dinosaurs</i> and both times the same thing happened. In the case of <i>Dinosaur, </i>it was meant to be a silent film, but then Disney decided that the animals should talk!<i> </i>That is excusable since it was Disney. In <i>Walking with Dinosaurs, </i>it was also meant to a silent (but more accurate) film, but literally at the last minute (the voice cast was casted in November 2013, that's how last minute it was) Fox (not BBC Earth) decided to add voice overs! At least this time the mouth doesn't actually move when they talk. Fox also made a very American decision. "The audience won't understand this, let's dumb it down!" I think that BBC Earth was just fine with no voice overs, and also, out of all the possible options to get a wider audience, voice overs? Really? They could have had just Morgan Freeman narrate it... or Kenneth Branagh. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
Also, the storyline of the film is just a copy and paste of <i>Dinosaur. </i>Migrating dinosaur, family gets separated, trying to win his love with a female but another male is in his path, but then he leads the herd and gets the female. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
The scene when the lead character runs from the dark forest and towards the herd reminded me of when Aladar was trotting to get to the herd and warn them not to go on the cliff and the follow him. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
Now, enough about the movie itself, and onto some not-really-negatives-but-controservial-stuff. The first is about the depiction of the feathered dinosaurs. Yes, accurate feathering, except when you get to the face. It's scaly! It's scaly! It. Is. Scaly!!!!! It is more likely that they had bird like faces, since they are more related to birds than they are to other reptiles. The same can be said of <i>Gorgosaurus</i>.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
It's scaly! It's scaly! It's. So. Freaking. Scaly!!!!! What's so wrong about a scaly <i>Gorgosaurus</i>? Oh, yes, science happened! This is really not that bad compared to the scaly-faced feathered dinosaurs, but they did miss an opportunity to show a feathered tyrannosaur kick ass on screen! The models for the <i>Gorgosaurus</i> where made just before the announcement of the giant feathered tyrannosaur, <i>Yutyrannus. </i>However, I think they should have put feathers on it, because<i> Gorgosaurus</i> did live in a cold climate, and probably would need feathers. And despite the find of skin impressions found on the base of a <i>Gorgosaurus</i> tail, I could argue that it didn't preserve the feathers. But still, this is a small caveat, that actually got more controversy than I expected. They did give the antagonistic<i> Gorgosaurus</i> iridescent blue scales, but I'm okay with that. I also notice that the juvenile <i>Gorgosaurus</i>, or what I thought where juvenile <i>Gorgosaurus</i>, lacked feathers too!</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
So in the end, we have an Americanized version of an inspirational BBC series. Seriously. I used to watch it on a daily basis when I was young, and I still do if I want to know what it was like when dinosaurs ruled the Earth. All in all, no laughs are coming out of the mouths of the audience, only tears from the eyes, and negative thoughts.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
A massively missed opportunity. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
For this movie, I was hesitant for this rating, and it has nothing to do with the visuals. My final score is: 3.5/10. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
Aurora borealis can't save it. Not even the golden pheasant <i>Hesperonychus</i> or the bright blue <i>Chirostenotes</i> can save it. A disappointment, and a waist of $85 million.</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-83038779391144631012013-12-14T15:24:00.002-08:002013-12-14T15:24:57.917-08:00Rise of the Obscure Species, Part 2Last time, I brought you many wonders of the obscurity world. <i>Acrophoca, Arctotherium, Inostrancevia uralensis, Ichthyovenator, Lythronax, Dinofelis, Xenosmilus, </i>and a few more. Now, I will continue with more obscure species that have yet to receive the light they deserve. This post, I will focus more on Mesozoic animals, mostly dinosaurs. Some have never been restored, others, have a unique restoration. All illustrations where kindly provided by Yutyrannus form the Dinosaur Toy Forum,who did them as soon as he could. Thanks!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg38D-oHlflgxU_GYdCLEqJXnKmQ8CspKmXzQJOqViJ0tv8V99YBDcWaWYRpCgEkHaKAKxhNTp3CoNnI5XHcVahaeksvvTvWHmlofsXeV7H7ZvUTQSjyWU74M9WLfbOj-FXwL0EZgsrX3MA/s1600/Acheroraptor_zpsdbb34ecd-1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="247" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg38D-oHlflgxU_GYdCLEqJXnKmQ8CspKmXzQJOqViJ0tv8V99YBDcWaWYRpCgEkHaKAKxhNTp3CoNnI5XHcVahaeksvvTvWHmlofsXeV7H7ZvUTQSjyWU74M9WLfbOj-FXwL0EZgsrX3MA/s320/Acheroraptor_zpsdbb34ecd-1.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
The new name for an old friend. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
We all remember him. <i>Acheroraptor </i>was the name recently given to the Hell Creek dromaeosaurid. At first, there was no evidence droameosaurids lived with Tyrannosaurus, but now there is irrefutable evidence. I have nothing to say except that the illustrator based the colours off of the Guam Rail, a very cool bird. It is flightless and as of now extinct in the wild.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgd_TCKJagW_lI7jtXu3_YsLPx0oysxGZLxHVT0YrVA_U0mXaAyAshIPxhro_xPrVdfhryTCuKoCikm8I8IMCILkxYxEwyoJZGGVBkMZqeKtVwoHEe6M_PXWcymCbPUd5bPKkvoHQGAce6q/s1600/AntarcticSauropod_zpscf68a66d.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="247" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgd_TCKJagW_lI7jtXu3_YsLPx0oysxGZLxHVT0YrVA_U0mXaAyAshIPxhro_xPrVdfhryTCuKoCikm8I8IMCILkxYxEwyoJZGGVBkMZqeKtVwoHEe6M_PXWcymCbPUd5bPKkvoHQGAce6q/s320/AntarcticSauropod_zpscf68a66d.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i>Antarctotitan</i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Jurassic Antarctica has been the new frontier in paleontology for me. It was populated by some pretty awesome dinosaurs, one of which, Cryolophosaurus, is one of the most complete Antarctic dinosaurs yet found. Another group of dinosaurs that lived there where the sauropods. You may be familiar to the primitive bipedal sauropod, Glacialisaurus, but there is also another, quite large sauropod from there. It has no formal name, and so the name I identify it as, is not the actual name. For now, I call it, <i>Antarctotitan. Antarctotitan </i>is not new to paleontology. It has been known from almost decade, but I haven't seen a restoration of it. Since there is no published skeletal of the dinosaur available, we have to look at relatives. In this case, the artist used Malawisaurus as a reference. Even though it is a Cretaceous titanosaur, I think of it as a good reference. I especially like the red head. I'm sure sauropods where not all dull coloured. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqdla8lzzlb_2ziZk0ifdjZPsRwCe1yENRkPYk-XlpmR8Mhnaq7x73i2puvFgV2fDtnnoey4L-XKGNqvP0QAstoDcsKgARTnhFE1Lu7cL2w2b3ybW7Er1iiDx7M79cRGqTeCkYvSKk7856/s1600/AustralianSpinosaur_zps36f8084e.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="246" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqdla8lzzlb_2ziZk0ifdjZPsRwCe1yENRkPYk-XlpmR8Mhnaq7x73i2puvFgV2fDtnnoey4L-XKGNqvP0QAstoDcsKgARTnhFE1Lu7cL2w2b3ybW7Er1iiDx7M79cRGqTeCkYvSKk7856/s320/AustralianSpinosaur_zps36f8084e.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Australian spinosaur</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
I have another obscure animal from the South Pole, only it's from the Cretaceous and from Australia. For namesake, I'll call it <i>Australospinas</i>. It has no formal name yet, but we'll call it that. <i>Australospinas </i>has been known for a few years, and only from vertebrae and a few other bones. It is mostly based on Baryonyx, but here it is featured as iridescent, even though it isn't seen in the picture. This is the second restoration of <i>Australospinas </i>I have seen, and I am surprised I haven't seen more. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicz6FtjEyEEoIiv0QlRRXNoPrsY0jYVgoaBR52VyxKqqz7-WNoElPmFC0EYQfTUXxFAb8nlRyVpi1dT73piVbqNiqYK8xRU0FoVRU0BTIA56nxeqzviaCvwAdPrCXE7jD_9HdDpSZNnv6N/s1600/Bradycneme_zps01e726fe.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="244" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicz6FtjEyEEoIiv0QlRRXNoPrsY0jYVgoaBR52VyxKqqz7-WNoElPmFC0EYQfTUXxFAb8nlRyVpi1dT73piVbqNiqYK8xRU0FoVRU0BTIA56nxeqzviaCvwAdPrCXE7jD_9HdDpSZNnv6N/s320/Bradycneme_zps01e726fe.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i>Bradycneme</i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Alverazsaurs are cool. They have the most interesting hands of any theropod. A very short arm, almost the mini-tyrannosaurs, except not as ferocious, but it only has one functional finger and claw. It has since been speculated that they hunted colonial insects, such as termites, or ants. Above is one of the rare alverazsaurs that only people like me and paleontologists know about. You may remember in the 2011 BBC documentary, Planet Dinosaur, depicted <i>Bradycneme </i>has a troodontid. However, it was recently classified as an alverazsaur. It should be noted that <i>Bradycneme</i> is known from very fragmentary remains, so it could be a troodontid. The one thing I like about this restoration is that it isn't shrink wrapped, with long feathers all over its body, and the hoatzin like head. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiAXKE3cr8WhMpHQTZtzYX45KcfSyDlHLE-QQyGUkkXAgw9HMTHyDHMt_U0BUiVA5bV6RMSHJLjSfdvQTCOEFAa4oEZWwBk_BvDTSgOap4kKuq3pTifrl8ghdRcEsg8vh0rveOal9I5cf39/s1600/Melanorosaurus_zpsf7d53db9.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="247" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiAXKE3cr8WhMpHQTZtzYX45KcfSyDlHLE-QQyGUkkXAgw9HMTHyDHMt_U0BUiVA5bV6RMSHJLjSfdvQTCOEFAa4oEZWwBk_BvDTSgOap4kKuq3pTifrl8ghdRcEsg8vh0rveOal9I5cf39/s320/Melanorosaurus_zpsf7d53db9.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i>Melanorosaurus</i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
One thing I am surprised to see is dinosaurs that have speculative soft-tissue that doesn't really fossilize, as I am sure that just like birds, they have bizarre fleshy structures used for mating that you wouldn't expect for it to have by looking at the skeletons. This seldom seen dinosaur above, <i>Melanorosaurus, </i>has a small red dewlap, used for attracting mates. It is unsure wether or not it had it, but I wouldn't be surprised if it had it. Relatives like <i>Diplodocus </i>get more attention, because they are larger than their early ancestors, but relatives like this are also very cool. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiusyjLsytDFxMfK1Lz7c37AIuJNiAc6tU9sCXx773hzAMHOma92TfhhZz31CwLaXEzBj5q8QOkCHmhD3vvLr1Wu2MojYMp1YqMpNdYUAe52bTZVfPfVnzGIZt4Ku7pfqumH0sJkL53ANUc/s1600/ZalambdalestesAlbino_zps62c67c77.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="246" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiusyjLsytDFxMfK1Lz7c37AIuJNiAc6tU9sCXx773hzAMHOma92TfhhZz31CwLaXEzBj5q8QOkCHmhD3vvLr1Wu2MojYMp1YqMpNdYUAe52bTZVfPfVnzGIZt4Ku7pfqumH0sJkL53ANUc/s320/ZalambdalestesAlbino_zps62c67c77.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i>Zalambdalestes</i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
For all of this post, we have been talking about dinosaurs, but we will end with a very cute and tiny Mesozoic mammal, <i>Zalambdalestes. </i>They were like the elephant shrews of the Cretaceous. They may have lived in underground burrows, and ate small insects. Overall, it was a perfect example of the typical Mesozoic mammal, and you would be seeing a lot of mammals looking like <i>Zalambdalestes</i>, although not all mammals where small and shrew-like. The <i>Zalambdalestes </i>in the picture above, is also albino, something so rare, I wish it was depicted more often. The only other piece I've seen features an albino Microraptor. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Overall, these animals are considerably more obscure than my first obscure species post, two of them don't even have formal names. This is not the last post on Obscure Species. I will have many more, and soon, an entire army of Obscurities will dominate this blog. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-80188208643317583322013-12-14T12:27:00.001-08:002013-12-14T12:27:19.412-08:00Grimm, Season 3, Episode 7; Cold Blooded Review<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9aYFhDg9LayI6OURd91DTIhFXHHQVV4d8PG2nclOg0K9R8KT9d7afA5G7LWI2hcEMzMWTk8VOep4nqtVdeieUXPgZIG0r8ZfC9moFOuTUGws8rJKdsSiJurGFLfNnvtFqrsP8J8JukRn3/s1600/307-Gelumcaedus.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9aYFhDg9LayI6OURd91DTIhFXHHQVV4d8PG2nclOg0K9R8KT9d7afA5G7LWI2hcEMzMWTk8VOep4nqtVdeieUXPgZIG0r8ZfC9moFOuTUGws8rJKdsSiJurGFLfNnvtFqrsP8J8JukRn3/s320/307-Gelumcaedus.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Sometimes, Nick encounters a Wesen that is just so freaking powerful, you wonder if he can take them down. Then again, Nick is just badass enough to take on anyone. This episode is an example of just how far Nick really has come in terms of his fighting skills. Back in episode 1, when he tried to help Aunt Marie while they were attacked by a Reaper, Nick just didn't have good reaction time, didn't know what type of maneuvers to do to counteract the attacks his enemy threw at him (sometimes literally).<br />
<br />
This episode, it seemed like he has unleashed his fighting skills in a tremendous way. If you remember episode 2 of season 3, "PTZD", Nick, as a zombie, took on Renard, Monroe, and Hank and was able to overpower all three without any problem. They are all very strong men. In this episode, Nick had to save Hank, who was kidnapped by alligator like Wesen called Gelumcaedus. Nick was forced to bring the two Gelumcaedus brothers their brother, who was arrested, or Hank dies. Nick gets there, and begins to free Hank, but suddenly, he is surrounded by three Gelumcaedus, all woged, all intent on killing him. To keep in mind, at the beginning of the episode, we saw one easily pick up a young man by biting his arm and lifting him up, and then shaking him around viciously and ripping his arm clean out of his socket. It is virtually impossible to escape this Wesens nasty bite. Luckily, Nick has an arm shield with a hidden blade to keep his arm safe.<br />
<br />
So, Nick is able to hold onto his own against three of the most powerful Wesen introduced this season, and they just have no idea who skilled he is. Nick has killed two Reapers, a Mauvais Dentes, a Nuckelavee, and four Hundjager. He's made a lot of heads roll onto the floor. So, yes, Nick just basically used almost no effort in taking on these monster Wesen. He is badass after all.<br />
<br />
Along with the fight scene, the episode itself was wonderful, the scenes in the sewers where very dark (sometimes too dark) and made you feel as if something is going to leap out at any minute. I really though Wu was going to be attacked. He is just found a severed leg instead.<br />
<br />
My only complaint was that the scenes, even in day time, were still way too dark. I am unsure why the lighting is so dark, but it is something I haven't noticed before, just this season. I hope they fix it sooner or later. Or it's my TV.<br />
<br />
I also like that we learned just a few more bits of mythology. So, Gelumcaedus are some of the oldest known Wesen, and Grimm's go by other names in other cultures, such as Decapitare, which Nick apparently likes, as that's basically all his ancestors did.<br />
<br />
I am going to review the Christmas special next featuring Krampus. And two hours of Grimm was really worth it, for what I call fantasy night. First I see the new Hobbit movie, and then two hours of Grimm. Awesome!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-91420843016159278932013-12-06T22:14:00.001-08:002013-12-07T08:43:15.089-08:00Grimm Season 3, Episode 6 Review; Stories We Tell Our Young<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjSO4wdCik6quTwTqcLqa6zb-j2TQOOB1idM9DNLDSbANryJB_JWwpXV4BlHAvgFB_Iqvw1gynE8dKhkp5HpU1e1ofSu-7sknVrqILnepvKKuyQXBsZF_bQzKhEGLGw4XwcFJy5nb5SNLFb/s1600/306-promo_trailer_kid.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="179" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjSO4wdCik6quTwTqcLqa6zb-j2TQOOB1idM9DNLDSbANryJB_JWwpXV4BlHAvgFB_Iqvw1gynE8dKhkp5HpU1e1ofSu-7sknVrqILnepvKKuyQXBsZF_bQzKhEGLGw4XwcFJy5nb5SNLFb/s320/306-promo_trailer_kid.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
The Grausen. And the kid wasn't possessed by a demon...</div>
<br />
The first episode of season 3 was one of the few times I was upset about this show. It seemed like Season 3 was shaping up with some average episodes. However, that all changed with the latest episode, "Stories We Tell Our Young", which is so far the best episode of season 3. First off, I love that another non-Wesen has been portrayed, this time a protozoan, not a demon, ghost, or anything like that. At first, the episode was about figuring out what happened to the boy, and how to cure him. However, then, upon the Wesen council's arrival, things took an unexpected twist. The council entered the boys room and took him, but lost him and chased him into the woods. The possible highlight of the episode was the entire scene. He enters the room, woges into a snow leopard-like Wesen, and tries to take the boy who runs into the woods, and the leopard Wesen follows him, but Nick tackles him down and they fight. I did not see any of that coming.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-j9smYSJiMwzzCllEOq2KvS6_k1KCBNA4vjTjHA787V1hg-kpjHUeaXoktnrVzJcG9LWncB_FfRFcfG4FgqNwGvq5a-HgFV8F69sQbtvkVg2LPKmOJ9SnaQ4pjCaF-coSgNZJcgcw8XYX/s1600/306-Leopard_Wesen.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="231" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-j9smYSJiMwzzCllEOq2KvS6_k1KCBNA4vjTjHA787V1hg-kpjHUeaXoktnrVzJcG9LWncB_FfRFcfG4FgqNwGvq5a-HgFV8F69sQbtvkVg2LPKmOJ9SnaQ4pjCaF-coSgNZJcgcw8XYX/s320/306-Leopard_Wesen.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
The council member comes to take the boy.</div>
<br />
This is also the second episode that we see Nick writing an entry about a creature, caring on the tradition of profiling these creatures, just like his ancestors did. I also liked that Renard is now out of town, and then getting attacked by the Verrat in the "safehouse", was unexpected and made things so much more complicated. Either way, it is setting up for something good.<br />
<br />
The next two episodes airing next week look awesome. First we have alligator Wesen in the sewers, and then a very special Christmas episode, with Krampus!<br />
<br />
My scoring for this episode is a 9/10. Best episode this season, and a great episode for their 50th episode milestone.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-20553341397332591362013-11-30T11:26:00.001-08:002013-11-30T11:27:28.352-08:00Grimm; El Cucuy ReviewThis episode begins with a unique quote. First, it is seen in Spanish, and then in English. It reads "Sleep child, sleep now... Or else the Bogeyman will come and eat you."El Cucuy is the Spanish version of the bogeyman, but is known by different names in other cultures. Now, this post does not contain many spoilers, so read on.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXzgzXo_-XYcXhKTGxBAt5mliDP8gE1IKrrJY3y1o0nphKXe_Em6kKlBTtoOYDSybQ8BO1lIya-vIYUs_AC5PRcXkO3332srwuXFxbFhJFmOoQ7Accnp5YMaFYSXMLd6ZwqygI84qTsJAC/s1600/305-El_Cucuy_attack.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="204" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXzgzXo_-XYcXhKTGxBAt5mliDP8gE1IKrrJY3y1o0nphKXe_Em6kKlBTtoOYDSybQ8BO1lIya-vIYUs_AC5PRcXkO3332srwuXFxbFhJFmOoQ7Accnp5YMaFYSXMLd6ZwqygI84qTsJAC/s320/305-El_Cucuy_attack.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
I didn't immediately get the reaction I did from La Llorona, but after the episode, I can feel the effect. I can't stop looking behind my back. Then again, I don't like being in the house alone at night. I got scared, and now I like the episode more because it scared me. However, no other episode of Grimm will be scarier than La Llorona. I couldn't sleep for a week. Even though I don't believe in El Cucuy, ghosts, demons, or any supernatural entity, it still scares me.<br />
<br />
The one thing that didn't go into detail was if El Cucuy was Wesen or not. It hears the cries of help from many miles away. Maybe it's a Wesen that has supersentive hearing, but are there other El Cucuies out there? Well according to El Cucuy itself, it's known by many names, and has been in cultures around the world for centuries. I don't think El Cucuy is a Wesen. I think it is another supernatural entity. Not a ghost, not a demon. I don't know.<br />
<br />
And I thought that this week's creepy episode was just a brief pop in of creep in Grimm, but next week looks even creepier. A case of demon possession, with a boy who woges into a... well, I'm not sure. And for the first time in a year, I couldn't sleep till 4:35 am because of Grimm.<br />
<br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-9019058611239429712013-11-26T15:22:00.000-08:002013-11-26T15:22:06.666-08:00Old Friend, New Name<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSV8eR2whfancrorMFh2o-UsByrDDU-GexawrK7gRVsQWdWgsnEfxEoJYVqkOfWy0jf6ijmTowvl3FSNqhO_HGp7TmS4EnlyZBN_wQuXsiLpb_EawyLmXBX6Kzq5jD-Ng85yhWGbRYV-7y/s1600/Acheroraptor_zpsdbb34ecd.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="247" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSV8eR2whfancrorMFh2o-UsByrDDU-GexawrK7gRVsQWdWgsnEfxEoJYVqkOfWy0jf6ijmTowvl3FSNqhO_HGp7TmS4EnlyZBN_wQuXsiLpb_EawyLmXBX6Kzq5jD-Ng85yhWGbRYV-7y/s320/Acheroraptor_zpsdbb34ecd.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Well, we've known the existence of dromaeosaurids from the Hell Creek Formation from tooth fragments, but whether <i>Dromaeosaurus</i> lived alongside <i>Tyrannosaurus</i> or not was not proven yet. Not until know. These tooth fragments didn't belong to <i>Dromaeosaurus</i>, but it was for sure a dromaeosaurid. Now, we finally have conclusive proof, that dromaeosaurids lived alongside the King of Dinosaurs. Meet, <i>Acheroraptor temertyorum</i>, the geologically youngster dromaeosaurid to date. Bizarre thing I realized. <i>Dromaeosaurus </i>is a dromaeosaurinae, (well, duh) but <i>Acheroraptor </i>was a velociraptorinae. This still means that dromaeosaurinae's did not live with the King, but hey, at least we got velociraptorinae's living with him.<br />
<br />
So, I think this finally proves the depiction in <i>Walking with Dinosaurs </i>(TV Series) of dromaeosaurids living with <i>Tyrannosaurus</i>. However, instead of the bulky <i>Deinonychus </i>like skull, it had a more <i>Velociraptor </i>like skull, because it was a velociraptorinae.<br />
<br />
I should mention, that my obscure species post will be the first of many, and the next ones will feature many new guys, including <i>Zalambdalestes, Acheroraptor, </i>and the unnamed Antarctic Sauropod (which I will identify for namesake as <i>Antarctotitan</i>), and the unnamed Australian spinosaurs (for namesake, <i>Australospinas</i>).Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-48082465461575357302013-11-23T16:46:00.000-08:002013-11-23T16:47:53.935-08:00GorgosaurusTime for my second <i>Walking with Dinosaurs </i>dinosaur review (the children's version, not the TV) and this time it's my third favourite Arctic dinosaur after Parksosaurus and the Alaskan Troodon. Gorgosaurus.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZX_uKGmwmVFQDVm9VRV2OqrRTZ5NGnrAHpg9ArrobPZy1e0jy7l6xsqTBzk-QsGzFEnLvRSXe_gddtWFnsu1uHOrmvlgENBr4gxtYw0xLDt3r1zC8b68WBRWnddZaIp1evZXcvyKBa8Ax/s1600/HeadU5S.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="282" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZX_uKGmwmVFQDVm9VRV2OqrRTZ5NGnrAHpg9ArrobPZy1e0jy7l6xsqTBzk-QsGzFEnLvRSXe_gddtWFnsu1uHOrmvlgENBr4gxtYw0xLDt3r1zC8b68WBRWnddZaIp1evZXcvyKBa8Ax/s320/HeadU5S.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Gorgon</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The Gorgosaurus in the movie is a beautiful iridescent blue, with white and black marking on its skull. I will first say before I go on, is that iridescent blue is unlikely for such a large predator. However, it could be seasonal, or it didn't need to be dull coloured to blend in. To be honest, this is not as big as a deal as another part of the design that I will talk about later. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The design of the Gorgosaurus seems to be very accurate, and the fact that we have Gorgosaurus instead of Tyrannosaurus on the big screen makes me want to smile. As I've stated before, I don't have such high hopes for the film, but the earplugs will hopefully make me enjoy what I wanted: silent dinosaur film. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
One of my biggest problems with the model is the integument. The Gorgosaurus in this movie are scaly. While it does look like what we always thought tyrannosaurs look like, recent new fossil discoveries show that even big tyrannosaurs can be feathered. In 2011, 3 specimens of the Chinese giant feathered tyrannosaurs, Yutyrannys huali, where found, but they weren't described until 2012. However, I can slightly forgive the scaly Gorgosaurus in the movie, because the models where made in 2010, a year before Yutyrannus was discovered, and a full two years before it was formally described and released to the public. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Many people use the discovery of Yutyrannus to argue that giant tyrannosaurs, specifically Tarbosaurus and Tyrannosaurus where fully feathered. Some argue that these animals lived in a much warmer environment than Yutyrannus. Yutyrannus may have experienced snow. Tyrannosaurus didn't, so for now, I am unsure if Tyrannosaurus was scaly or feathered, but I hope for it to be feathered because that would be more interesting. However, with Gorgosaurus it is different. It is around the same size as Yutyrannus, and lived in a much colder place than Yutyrannus did. Four months of darkness and freezing cold every winter. Therefore, it seems that Gorgosaurus was more likely to have feathers. It should be noted that impressions of scales on the base of Gorgosaurus' tail have been found, but it is possible that other parts of it's body are feathered, or that the tail was covered in feathers, but the type of preservation didn't preserve feathers. Also, it seems like the film makers thought that scaly tyrannosaurs would be more recognizable to the audience. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
I give this Gorgosaurus a 8/10.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
In the end, I think if the Gorgosaurus won't talk, he will be my favourite character in the entire film. And below, is what the movie tyrannosaur could have been. Until next time. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhaN6QlvXWFH5mzxZW5kuzZcUN6J1pfKJmLtnJgur-rpXscfWiLIQVb9AQY2ziah9BBvf3EHcPeaMSe7A9Yb2GENduOjzJWxPuTrEHtmsbZtXTcHtCOeU0VBx0FVoDlrqMGbeModP_GEISn/s1600/Scan+20.tiff" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="137" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhaN6QlvXWFH5mzxZW5kuzZcUN6J1pfKJmLtnJgur-rpXscfWiLIQVb9AQY2ziah9BBvf3EHcPeaMSe7A9Yb2GENduOjzJWxPuTrEHtmsbZtXTcHtCOeU0VBx0FVoDlrqMGbeModP_GEISn/s320/Scan+20.tiff" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-31197188034014486682013-11-19T18:18:00.001-08:002013-11-19T18:20:37.704-08:00The Rise of Obscure Prehistoric AnimalsThis post is about obscure species of the past. They are rarely represented in paleoart and deserve to get more attention. Animals like Smilodon, the woolly mammoth, Triceratops, and Tyrannosaurus, all, are in the way of people knowing about these fantastic animals.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfAx8TutjAyyMukOzIdxUZ_WQprUChFnceq0_cxptyVmLXJR34QXegO-Wzoellqiy2cyBg8Qf9nYSXY6CzGiNHSNiC5HSsXmeFPlXDFVjv131xqBfHDt3z3al-Se2wJHLB80YMQrGTTwWh/s1600/Acrophoca_zps5bf00c47.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="263" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfAx8TutjAyyMukOzIdxUZ_WQprUChFnceq0_cxptyVmLXJR34QXegO-Wzoellqiy2cyBg8Qf9nYSXY6CzGiNHSNiC5HSsXmeFPlXDFVjv131xqBfHDt3z3al-Se2wJHLB80YMQrGTTwWh/s320/Acrophoca_zps5bf00c47.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Acrophoca lonairostris</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Our first creature, is Acrophoca. I never even knew this animal existed until about two months ago. Acrophoca is an ancestor to the modern day leopard seal, but unlike leopard seals, they lived in the waters around Peru or Argentina, have claws on their flippers, and ate fish, instead of penguins. They lack the canines that grip and tear up penguins, but have the teeth for noming on fish. Overall, the restoration above it similar to the only skeletal of this animal, and gives it brown fur, unlike the few restorations that have leopard seal patterning. Overall, a unique and beautiful Pliocene pinniped. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjlmgZDLKryFza4buUdA23bfAXJGlAvdvVIQ45vglo8VmG9vA8q_NpkMwgX47IvAU2mncvEfN2XiG5_foJ8yQd2qYuSMa6rB2-_Awhvnl7d7bAJiLJ7Zz7CiUOespahS8FyYX2EsCzR3FEo/s1600/Arctotherium_zps5c4e9b75.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="243" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjlmgZDLKryFza4buUdA23bfAXJGlAvdvVIQ45vglo8VmG9vA8q_NpkMwgX47IvAU2mncvEfN2XiG5_foJ8yQd2qYuSMa6rB2-_Awhvnl7d7bAJiLJ7Zz7CiUOespahS8FyYX2EsCzR3FEo/s320/Arctotherium_zps5c4e9b75.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Arctotherium augistidens</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
We are now moving on to the pinnipeds closest living relative, bears. Above is one of the very few reconstructions of a contender for the largest carnivorous land mammal on Earth. Arctotherium, the South American Short Faced Bear. The short faced bears are all but extinct today, the only relative being the speckled bear in South America. Bears are not native to South America, but around the start of the Pleistocene, a land bridge formed, allowing animals from North and South America to invade either area. One of the North American migrants where the short faced bears. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Above, you are looking at Arctotherium. It is thought to be weighing close to a tonne, and be 3 meters long. This alone makes it bigger than Arctodus, its North American cousin. Why it got so big is still a mystery, but the restoration above is on the few (sadly) of this animal, and really shows just how robust they were. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-dQxUway04evevZEbb9EurT6lToZoFJ9zXFJvpNtsBFo_jv1bstVGctADIjnxDob9l8O372Bpt4KCDhBJU2lAVo2w-hQ0g75SZe9D_Rb1xRNZRSpwZ3rmprV7Ot33jOBDkBTMc8euZ4tt/s1600/Dinofelis_zps52a145a8.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="246" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-dQxUway04evevZEbb9EurT6lToZoFJ9zXFJvpNtsBFo_jv1bstVGctADIjnxDob9l8O372Bpt4KCDhBJU2lAVo2w-hQ0g75SZe9D_Rb1xRNZRSpwZ3rmprV7Ot33jOBDkBTMc8euZ4tt/s320/Dinofelis_zps52a145a8.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Dinofelis pivetaui</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
When thinking about Cenozoic carnivorous mammals, you just can't forget one very deadly one. The Machairodonts, or the sabre-toothed cats. The most famous is Smilodon fatalis, from North America of the Pleistocene, but many are left in the dark and often not known. Another moderately well known Machairodont is Dinofelis, which got its popularity thanks the the fantastic <i>Walking with Beasts</i>. However, in most restorations, this cat is depicted robust, like in WWB, and also a similar pattern. This type of art is very common in the paleoart community, and it wasn't until All Yesterdays that we managed to finally think outside the box. Above, I would categorize this as All Yesterdays. Instead of the robust WWB Dinofelis we all know, we have a cheetah like Dinofelis. While I think Dinofelis was not as fast as a cheetha, it was certainly deadlier. With its small but incredibly dangerous sabre-teeth, there is no way an early hominid could survive a bite to the head, from this predator. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1Rw6OirjVxPVcjiMBcpbyyxiy7nuS7umAGCpFWpQCHZL6bw7fFEobDp4jQFJC1Pf_SeC9raHCp6xKX3pZMQ3Hn6OvMkCbeEK5Z43voe8U45E29yqWgV6ekwdy6YeOq3JhlKx4JaInlp46/s1600/Ichthyovenator_zps04a7ba94.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="246" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1Rw6OirjVxPVcjiMBcpbyyxiy7nuS7umAGCpFWpQCHZL6bw7fFEobDp4jQFJC1Pf_SeC9raHCp6xKX3pZMQ3Hn6OvMkCbeEK5Z43voe8U45E29yqWgV6ekwdy6YeOq3JhlKx4JaInlp46/s320/Ichthyovenator_zps04a7ba94.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Ichthyovenator laosensis</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
We recently learned of the discovery of Ichthyovenator, the most appropriately named spinosaur to date, and its bizarre sail. I will say one thing. I think a skin membrane or a fat storing area would fill the gap between the sails, but this is speculation and has nothing to do with the illustration above. The pose and basic build of the animal is based off of Scott Hartmans Suchomimus skeletal, and it is possible that Ichthyovenator was closely related to Suchomimus. However, this animal is restored in a way that I haven't seen before. It isn't shrink wrapped! The animal actually looks like something that can swim and catch prey with his arms, and use its tail to help swim through the swamps of Cretaceous Laos, and this should be depicted more often. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjc_XmuLWy4ZcboNwcKkH6xzjg0SiU6B4_AYFhTp_tnfwyJtY4RXTxo7fknC3WSTgc5iMBBqPBhLiLUQuBWcVD0YhkFzwR4p_2P0WQ1DbzH_K-KFQbVF5qkXVZxp2OXtKnKZtCmAgitFVYi/s1600/Lythronax_zpsb5c7d445.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="244" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjc_XmuLWy4ZcboNwcKkH6xzjg0SiU6B4_AYFhTp_tnfwyJtY4RXTxo7fknC3WSTgc5iMBBqPBhLiLUQuBWcVD0YhkFzwR4p_2P0WQ1DbzH_K-KFQbVF5qkXVZxp2OXtKnKZtCmAgitFVYi/s320/Lythronax_zpsb5c7d445.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
I don't need to explain</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Recently, we learned about HIS existence, but I won't rehash that. Instead, I'll talk about a unique way the artist depicted him above. I learned that the artist was trying to portray Lythronax as a scavenger. In my blog post, I stated that someone was not to far off saying that it was a scavenger. However, I don't find it infuriating. I find this theory intresting, and it is possible that Lythronax was part of a group of tyrannosaurs that scavenged, rather than hunting. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlQ-lJpOg9_xhM6QcizB1bRcldKR-mMxbgmqcFJ8Y0Tez3RVZnN2xDmqSxIWtA0NEAnNtkNgrSL-jJc64B_ox_LLWEVFmp-fRu6GLP_CbXT1BfFi1k5gh9gHWhAGXhK0ox0srhdnuR4CkR/s1600/Inostrancevia_zpsb8ea073a.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="243" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlQ-lJpOg9_xhM6QcizB1bRcldKR-mMxbgmqcFJ8Y0Tez3RVZnN2xDmqSxIWtA0NEAnNtkNgrSL-jJc64B_ox_LLWEVFmp-fRu6GLP_CbXT1BfFi1k5gh9gHWhAGXhK0ox0srhdnuR4CkR/s320/Inostrancevia_zpsb8ea073a.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Inostrancevia uralensis</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
I love this restoration. I am in deep love with it. When we see Inostrancevia, we also see the most well known species, <i>I. alexandri</i>. Instead, we have <i>I. uralensis. </i>I haven't seen another restoration of this species ( may have missed something) and it's good to see it instead of another <i>I. alexandri. </i>It is also good to see a rare restoration of a rarely depicted Inostrancevia species in a rare way. The colours are based off of wolverines, and it has fur all over its body. This shows the reptiles relationship to mammals. It has long fur on its belly and arms, something I've never seen before. It also has whiskers, something rarely depicted too, and it even has a mammal like nose. It may be that gorgonopsids where not covered in fur, but maybe they where. I speculate that while they lay eggs, they may have suckled their young. However, that is my theory, and has nothing to do with the rare restoration of a rare species of Inostrancevia. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEips0qw0vYAIoHg2wwmJ2lx-mrk4S4j0hljaUrXUSvgkLRpG2tnTb2tIG-v7YpQqBTkeZQMue91DgyhuQhB7ToV5hzWM5YUh8fDxfHSfVHrvinZ7PvYCPibbK6qYlw1iCA7ZU88yzVFFfNY/s1600/Xenosmilus_zps1ac6b739.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="246" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEips0qw0vYAIoHg2wwmJ2lx-mrk4S4j0hljaUrXUSvgkLRpG2tnTb2tIG-v7YpQqBTkeZQMue91DgyhuQhB7ToV5hzWM5YUh8fDxfHSfVHrvinZ7PvYCPibbK6qYlw1iCA7ZU88yzVFFfNY/s320/Xenosmilus_zps1ac6b739.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Xenosmilus hodsonae</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
I will end my longest blog post on another rarely depicted Machairodont, Xenosmilus. It has the look of a tiger, but more robust, with a shorter tail, and longer canines. I should also note that while the artist was making it, he let people suggest what pattern and colour it should be. I suggested the golden tiger (a very rare breed of tiger) and he went with it. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
I have to thank Yutyrannus from the Dinosaur Toy Forum for letting me use his artwork as I ramble on about the fantastically obscure species he chose to restorate. Until next time, have a great day!</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6691858135003963213.post-22287492278576689622013-11-16T08:26:00.001-08:002013-11-19T18:21:00.992-08:00Grimm; Season 3, Episode 4 Review; One Night Stand<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3U5Zw1ga4Qmd0Otf665MbT8Dl0KOsIlwI9SE1l37zzY481cF6hwn4oO6-Pj0DWuomJmgaU4zEPfQA6KXrTGy_zATSviMehcyVQLRvYVdeQlz_2ZMiQfDc8_Ed-8FfI5jW9xfIQFpfJGVW/s1600/304-Quote.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="179" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3U5Zw1ga4Qmd0Otf665MbT8Dl0KOsIlwI9SE1l37zzY481cF6hwn4oO6-Pj0DWuomJmgaU4zEPfQA6KXrTGy_zATSviMehcyVQLRvYVdeQlz_2ZMiQfDc8_Ed-8FfI5jW9xfIQFpfJGVW/s320/304-Quote.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
The Little Mermaid</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Last week, we had no new Wesen, and a little disappointing storyline. This week, we had a great storyline, a totally new awesome Wesen, and good action. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
I loved the new and very interesting Wesen, the mermaid-like Naiad. The females look very pretty, with deep blue eyes. On the other hand, the males look ugly and mean, with bright orange eyes, and sharp nasty teeth.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuExmwHL4voDDAVqDxSdl9saEFsSvLi1bkPojwuE3idwu7KaVKkrmw2cEbCCoGGlQegdqGglIhszlA0fmFrELUn8ICA4CsqJeNbqPjOyXk_nQJ03kTE7MGxdHT_bWUrBVfElnEVrn0b7bc/s1600/304-Mermaid3.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="181" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuExmwHL4voDDAVqDxSdl9saEFsSvLi1bkPojwuE3idwu7KaVKkrmw2cEbCCoGGlQegdqGglIhszlA0fmFrELUn8ICA4CsqJeNbqPjOyXk_nQJ03kTE7MGxdHT_bWUrBVfElnEVrn0b7bc/s320/304-Mermaid3.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Female</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiErGIzrxMs42rDZ5H-_HwDLrn4jajMmJyoNMeqt4VcbB-pJ9Pr1WtRns-vL_etReM40iawSfiaM-zE5PQJprmMq-PupdhJRhJxU-c5y-jtrW95POOs3aSroQZFeXK5g0V_bKlUulBKEPKP/s1600/185px-304-Male_mermaid.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiErGIzrxMs42rDZ5H-_HwDLrn4jajMmJyoNMeqt4VcbB-pJ9Pr1WtRns-vL_etReM40iawSfiaM-zE5PQJprmMq-PupdhJRhJxU-c5y-jtrW95POOs3aSroQZFeXK5g0V_bKlUulBKEPKP/s1600/185px-304-Male_mermaid.png" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Male</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Apparently, Naiad males are born sterile, and because of that, female Naiad's must mate with humans in order to continue the species. Because of this, it is considered that all Naiad's are half-Naiads. There are old traditions of Naiad males being uncomfortable to have a human raise their own young, and the punishment of that is cutting the webbing between their toes and fingers. However, not many Naiad's follow the old tradition, but in this episode, a pair of males from Alaska are following the old traditions, and try to cut a female, but Nick and Hank arrive to kick their asses down (sometimes literally). </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Also, it seems like Nick has a new superpower from the Cracher-Mortel toxic spit. He was underwater for far longer than ever before, and when he returned to the surface, he looked gray and cold again. How long will the zombie hangover last?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Overall I give this episode a 8/10, because of the introduction of a new and awesome Wesen, and new mythology, and great action scenes. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Next week's episode looks scary as hell, and I love that. El Cucuy? Apparently it is a "real" legend, the Spanish version of the Boogeyman. I have a feeling this episode will be creepy. I had a similar reaction when looking at the trailer of La Llorona. That trailer alone scared the hell out of me, and the episode itself is one of the very few times I actually got scared watching this show. I will never again watch that episode at night. I hope I get the same thought from El Cucuy in two weeks.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030418246868552455noreply@blogger.com0